Daily Whipline

June 26, 2009

Whipline

Printable Format

House Meets At... Votes Predicted At...
9:00 a.m For Legislative Business
Ten "One-Minutes" Per Side		 Last Vote: ???
Any anticipated Member absences for votes this week should be reported to the Office of the Majority Whip at 226-3210

Floor Schedule and Procedure

  • H. Res. 587 - Rule providing for consideration of H.R. 2454 - American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (Rep. Matsui - Rules):  The structured rule provides for three hours of general debate, with 2 ½ hours to be equally divided and controlled by the Chair and Ranking Minority Member of the Committee on Energy & Commerce, and 30 minutes to be equally divided and controlled by the Chair and Ranking Minority Member of the Committee on Ways & Means.  The rule provides that in lieu of the amendment recommended by the Committee on Energy and Commerce now printed in the bill, an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of H.R. 2998, modified by the amendment printed in part A of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying this resolution, shall be considered as adopted.  The rule also makes in order the further amendment in the nature of a substitute printed in part B of the report of the Committee on Rules, if offered by Rep. Forbes or his designee, which shall be in order without intervention of any point of order except those arising under clause 9 or 10 of rule XXI, shall be considered as read, and shall be separately debatable for 30 minutes equally divided and controlled by the proponent and an opponent.  The rule provides one motion to recommit the bill with or without instructions.  Debate on the rule will be managed by Rep. Matsui, and consideration will proceed as follows: 
    • Possible one hour of debate on the rule.
    • Possible vote on a Democratic Motion ordering the previous question. Members are urged to vote yes.
    • Possible vote on adoption of the rule. Members are urged to vote yes.
  • H.R. 2454 - American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009 (Rep. Waxman  - Energy & Commerce):   Pursuant to H.Res. 587, debate on the bill be managed by Energy & Commerce Committee Chairman Henry Waxman and Ways & Means Committee Chairman Charles Rangel.  Consideration of the bill will proceed as follows:
    • 2 ½ hours of general debate managed by Rep. Waxman.
    • 30 minutes of debate managed by Rep. Rangel.
    • 30 minutes of debate and possible vote on Republican substitute amendment. Members are urged to VOTE NO.
    • Possible debate and vote on Republican motion to recommit the bill.
    • Vote on final passage of the bill. Members are urged to VOTE YES.
  • Complete Consideration of H.R. 2996 - Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010 (Rep. Dicks - Appropriations):  Consideration of the bill will proceed as follows:
    • Postponed votes on amendments to the bill.
    • Possible debate and vote on Republican motion to recommit the bill.
    • Vote on final passage of the bill. Members are urged to VOTE YES.

Bill Summary & Key Issues

Summary of H.R. 2454 - American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009

On May 21, 2009, the Energy and Commerce Committee reported the American Clean Energy and Security Act by a vote of 33 to 25.  The legislation will create millions of new clean energy jobs, enhance America's energy independence, and protect the environment.  The summary below reflects changes in the substitute amendment filed with the Rules Committee on June 22, 2009.

Key provisions in the bill:

  • Require electric utilities to meet 20% of their electricity demand through renewable energy sources and energy efficiency by 2020.
  • Invest in new clean energy technologies and energy efficiency, including energy efficiency and renewable energy ($90 billion in new investments by 2025), carbon capture and sequestration ($60 billion), electric and other advanced technology vehicles ($20 billion), and basic scientific research and development ($20 billion).
  • Mandate new energy-saving standards for buildings and appliances, and promote energy efficiency in industry.
  • Reduce carbon emissions from major U.S. sources by 17% by 2020 and over 80% by 2050 compared to 2005 levels. Complementary measures in the legislation, such as investments in preventing tropical deforestation, will achieve significant additional reductions in carbon emissions.
  • Protect consumers from energy price increases. According to estimates from the Environmental Protection Agency, the reductions in carbon pollution required by the legislation will cost American families less than a postage stamp per day. CBO calculates that the legislation will cost the average household less than 50 cents per day.

Because of its balanced approach, the American Clean Energy and Security Act has received broad support from industry and environmentalists.  During Committee consideration, the legislation was backed by a coalition that included electric utilities, oil companies, car companies, chemical companies, major manufacturers, environmental organizations, and labor organizations, among many others.  According to the Congressional Budget Office, the legislation meets PAYGO requirements.

 

CBO Score

According to the CBO score of the legislation, ACES meets PAYGO requirements.  For scoring purposes, CBO considers the creation of allowances as an increase in revenues and the free distribution of allowances as an offsetting outlay.  Using this methodology, CBO estimates that the legislation will raise federal revenues by $846 billion over ten years and increase direct spending by $821 billion, resulting in a net $24 billion reduction in the federal budget deficit. 

 

Consumer Protection from Energy Price Increases

ACES establishes five programs to protect consumers from energy price increases:  one for electricity price increases; one for natural gas price increases; one for heating oil price increases; one to protect low- and moderate-income families; and one to provide tax dividends to consumers.  In combination, these programs substantially reduce the impact of ACES on American consumers.  EPA has estimated that ACES would cost the average household $80 to $111 per year, less than a postage stamp per day.  According to EPA, families would actually spend less on utility bills in 2020 than they would in the absence of legislation because of the energy efficiency provisions in ACES.

CBO has reached a similar estimate, calculating that that the global warming provisions in legislation will cost the average household just $175 in 2020.  The EPA and CBO estimates do not take into account any of the benefits of preventing global warming, and the CBO estimate does not take into account the considerable savings to households from the bill's energy efficiency provisions.

Protection from Electricity Price Increases.  Electricity price increases will be regional in nature, with the greatest increases occurring in the coal-dependent regions of the country.  To mitigate these price increases, the regulated utilities that distribute electricity to consumers will receive 32% of allowances through 2025 under a formula that distributes half of the allowances based on emissions and half based on electricity generation.  These utilities are directed to use these allowances exclusively to keep rates low and, to the extent they use rebates, to do so to the maximum extent practicable by reducing the fixed-rate portion of consumer electricity bills.  As filed with the Rules Committee, the legislation contains a new ratepayer fairness provision that ensures against windfalls by providing that no local distribution company should receive more allowances than necessary to cover its direct and indirect costs.

Protection from Natural Gas Price Increases.  To mitigate increases in natural gas prices, the regulated utilities that distribute natural gas to consumers will receive 9% of allowances from 2016 through 2025.  One-third of these allowances must be used for energy efficiency programs.  The remainder must be passed through to consumers through lower prices under provisions similar to those that apply to the regulated electric utilities.

Protection from Heating Oil Price Increases.  To mitigate increases in home heating oil prices, states will receive 1.6% of allowances through 2025 under a formula based on home heating oil use.  These allowances must be used for rebates to consumers and investments in energy efficiency. 

Protection of Low- and Moderate Income Families.  The electricity, natural gas, and heating oil provisions mitigate the costs of ACES on all consumers.  In addition, ACES directs that 15% of the allowances be auctioned and the proceeds distributed back to consumers through a combination of refundable tax credits and electronic benefit payments.  The Center for Budget and Policy Priorities estimates that these provisions will fully protect the bottom quintile of families and part of the next quintile from any direct or indirect energy price increases. 

Consumer Climate Dividend.  Under ACES, many of the allowance provisions phase out starting in 2026.  As these allowance allocations are phased out, ACES directs that the remaining allowances be auctioned and the proceeds distributed to consumers through tax credits.

 

Clean Energy Provisions

Renewable Electricity Standard.  The American Clean Energy and Security Act (ACES) requires retail electric suppliers to meet a growing percentage of their load with electricity generated from renewable resources and electricity savings.  The combined renewable electricity and electricity savings requirement begins at 6% in 2012 and gradually rises to 20% in 2020.  At least three quarters (75%) of the requirement must be met by renewable energy, except that upon receiving a petition from the governor, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission can reduce the renewable requirement to three fifths (60%).  In 2020, 15% of the electricity load in each state must be met with renewable electricity and 5% with electricity savings.  Upon petition by the governor, the renewable requirement can be reduced to 12% and the electricity savings can be increased to 8%. 

Investments in Clean Energy.  ACES requires major sources of carbon emissions to obtain a pollution permit called an "allowance" for each ton of carbon dioxide or its equivalent that they emit.  Through 2025, 13% of these allowances are allocated to investments in clean energy and energy efficiency.  Using EPA estimates of allowance prices, ACES invests over $190 billion through 2025 in clean energy and energy efficiency programs, including:  $90 billion in state programs to promote renewable energy and energy efficiency; $60 billion in carbon capture and sequestration technologies; $20 billion in electric and other advanced technology vehicles; and $20 billion in basic research and development into clean energy and energy efficiency.  The investments in carbon capture and sequestration include $10 billion generated through a small "wires charge" on electricity generated through fossil fuels.

Investments in clean energy continue after 2025, with 5% of allowances being devoted to renewable energy and energy efficiency, 5% to carbon capture and sequestration, and 1.5% to research and development.

Supporting Private Investment in Clean Energy.  ACES establishes a self-sustaining Clean Energy Deployment Administration to support private investments in clean energy technologies, including nuclear power.  Other provisions promote private investment in clean energy by reforming the existing Title 17 loan guarantee program. 

Modernizing the Electricity Grid.  ACES includes provisions to promote deployment of smart grid technology and enhanced transmission planning.

 

Energy Efficiency Provisions

Building Standards.  ACES establishes new standards for building efficiency, requiring new buildings to be 30% more efficient in 2012 and 50% more efficient in 2016.  States are offered allowances that they can sell to support adoption and enforcement of the new standards.  The Department of Energy must enforce the standards in states that do not incorporate the building standards into their state building codes. 

Appliance Standards.   ACES mandates new efficiency standards for lighting products, commercial furnaces, and other appliances. 

Vehicle Standards.   The ACES discussion draft included provisions to harmonize federal fuel economy standards with EPA carbon emission standards and California's standards for light-duty vehicles.  These provisions were dropped in the reported bill after the Administration reached an agreement on light-duty fuel economy standards with the automakers and California.  The reported bill retains requirements for EPA to promulgate carbon emission standards for heavy-duty vehicles and off-road vehicles, such as construction equipment, trains, and large ships.  ACES also integrates consideration of climate change into the existing transportation planning process to further reduce transportation-related energy consumption.

Other Efficiency Measures.  ACES contains measures to increase the efficiency of water use and promote energy savings by the federal government and other public institutions.  As filed with the Rules Committee, the legislation creates a new energy efficiency program for small utilities with dedicated funding.

 

Global Warming Provisions

ACES contains three primary programs for reducing dangerous carbon emissions that cause global warming:  (1) a cap on large domestic sources of emissions; (2) a program to reduce tropical deforestation; and (3) an offset program.  In addition, ACES caps emissions of global warming pollutants that are substitutes for ozone-depleting chemicals, and it requires EPA to set performance standards for some uncapped sources of emissions.  Taken together, these programs will reduce carbon emissions by 28% to 33% below 2005 levels by 2020.  By 2050, ACES will reduce carbon emissions by over 80% below 2005 levels through these programs.

Capping Carbon Emissions from Large Sources.  Starting in 2012, ACES establishes annual tonnage limits on emissions of carbon and other global warming pollutants from large U.S. sources like electric utilities and oil refiners.  Under these limits, carbon pollution from large sources must be reduced by 17% below 2005 levels by 2020 and 83% below 2005 levels by 2050.  To achieve these limits, ACES establishes a system of tradable permits called "emission allowances" modeled after the successful Clean Air Act program to prevent acid rain.  This market-based approach provides economic incentives for industry to reduce carbon emissions at the lowest cost to the economy.

Preventing Tropical Deforestation.  ACES directs EPA and the State Department to use 5% of the allowances to secure agreements from developing nations to prevent tropical deforestation.  This program will reduce carbon emissions by an additional 10 percentage points below 2005 levels by 2020. 

Emission Offsets.  ACES allows capped sources to increase their carbon emissions if they can obtain offsetting emission reductions from uncapped sources at a lower cost.  The legislation allows capped sources to use offsets to acquire up to 2 billion tons of emission credits annually.  Half of these credits must come from domestic sources, except that if insufficient domestic offsets are available, up to 1.5 billion tons of emission credits can be obtained from international offset projects.  Starting in 2017, ACES requires capped sources to turn in five tons of international offsets to receive four tons of emission credits.  This mechanism will reduce carbon emissions by up to an additional five percentage points below 2005 levels by 2020.

ACES contains multiple provisions to ensure the integrity of offsets, including review by an independent scientific panel.  Offsets may not be obtained from sources in a foreign nation until the United States has entered into an agreement with the originating nation establishing the terms of the offset program. 

Cost-Containment Measures.  ACES contains numerous cost-containment measures recommended by an industry-environmental coalition called the U.S. Climate Action Partnership (USCAP).  These include unlimited banking, a two-year compliance period (which allows borrowing one year in advance), and a strategic reserve of allowances that are available for auction if allowance prices exceed 160% of their three-year average.  The proceeds of any sales from the reserve will be used to acquire additional international offsets, which will replenish the reserve at a low cost and result in additional reductions in carbon emissions.  In addition, ACES establishes a minimum floor price for auctioned allowances of $10 (in 2009 dollars) to provide stability and investment certainty.

Carbon Capture and Sequestration.  ACES uses a combination of regulatory requirements and financial incentives to ensure that new coal-fired power plants will operate with carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) technology.  All new coal plants permitted after 2020 must use CCS when they commence operations.  Coal plants permitted between 2015 and 2020 lose eligibility for federal financial assistance if they do not use CCS when they commence operations; if they do not use CCS when they commence operations, they must retrofit CCS by no later than 2025 without federal financial assistance.  Coal plants permitted between 2009 and 2015 lose eligibility for federal financial assistance if they do not retrofit CCS within five years after commencing operations; if they do not retrofit CCS by this date, they must retrofit CCS by no later than 2025 without federal financial assistance.  The 2025 retrofit deadline is accelerated if four gigawatts of electricity generation is deployed with CCS before 2025; it may also be extended by EPA by up to 18 months on a case-by-case basis.

 

Allowance Provisions

ACES requires that major U.S. sources of emissions obtain an allowance for each ton of carbon or its equivalent emitted into the atmosphere.  EPA estimates that in 2005 dollars, these allowances will cost $11 to $15 in 2012 and increase to $22 to $28 by 2025.  These allowance price estimates are consistent with estimates by the Congressional Budget Office.  According to CBO, allowance prices in 2005 dollars will be $14 in 2012 and increase to $28 by 2025.  At these allowance prices, the total value of the allowances created under the legislation ranges from $50 to $70 billion in 2012 to $90 to $120 billion in 2025. 

For the period from 2012 through 2025, 55% of the allowances will be used to protect consumers from energy price increases; 19% will be used to assist trade-vulnerable and other industries make the transition to a clean energy economy; 13% will be used to support investments in clean energy and energy efficiency; and 10% will be used for domestic adaptation, worker assistance and training, prevention of deforestation, and international adaptation.  The remainder (3% of allowances) will be used to help ensure that ACES is budget neutral.

From the period from 2026 through 2050, up to 58% of the allowances will be used to protect consumers; 19% will be used for domestic adaptation, worker assistance and training, prevention of deforestation, and international adaptation; 12% will be used to support investments in clean energy and energy efficiency; 7% will be used to ensure budget neutrality; and at least 4% will be used to assist trade-vulnerable and other industries. 

Under ACES, approximately 80% of allowances are distributed without charge during the early years of the program to ease the transition to a clean energy economy.  This transition period starts to phase out after 2025.  By 2031, about 70% of the allowances are auctioned.

Protection of Trade-Vulnerable and Other Industries.  Pursuant to the Inslee-Doyle program, energy-intensive, trade-exposed industries that make products like iron, steel, cement, and paper will receive allowances to cover their increased costs.  The number of allowances set aside for this program will equal 15% of the allowances in 2014 and then decrease based on the percent reductions in the carbon emissions cap.  These allowances will phase out after 2025 unless the President decides the program is still needed. 

In addition, oil refiners will receive 2% of allowances starting in 2014 and ending in 2026, and merchant coal producers and electricity producers obligated to supply electricity under long-term contracts will receive 5% of allowances through 2025.  As filed with the Rules Committee, the legislation provides an additional 0.25 percent of allowances for small business refiners from 2014 through 2026.

Investments in Clean Energy and Energy Efficiency.  States will receive 10% of allowances from 2012 through 2015; 7% of allowances in 2016 and 2017; 6% of allowances from 2018 through 2021; and 5% of allowances thereafter for investments in renewable energy, energy efficiency, and pollution reducing transportation projects.  Two percent of allowances from 2014 through 2017 and 5% thereafter will be available to electric utilities to cover the costs of installing and operating carbon capture and sequestration technologies (from 2014 through 2017, a small portion of these allowances will be used to offset the costs to the Treasury of the Carbon Storage Research Corporation, which will invest an additional $10 billion in carbon capture and sequestration technologies).  Three percent of allowances from 2012 through 2017 and 1% of allowances from 2018 through 2025 will be available for investments in electric vehicles and other advanced automobile technology and deployment.  One-and-a-half percent of allowances in each year will be allocated to support research and development in advanced clean energy and energy efficiency technologies. 

Domestic Adaptation.  From 2012 through 2021, 2% of allowances will be allocated to prepare the United States to adapt to the impacts of climate change.  The amount of allowances allocated for domestic adaptation will increase to 4% from 2022 through 2026 and to 8% thereafter.  Half of these allowances will be used for wildlife and natural resource protection and half for other domestic adaptation purposes, including public health. 

Preventing Tropical Deforestation and International Adaptation.  From 2012 through 2025, 5% of allowances will be allocated to prevent tropical deforestation and build capacity to generate international deforestation offsets.  The allowances allocated to this program will be reduced to 3% from 2026 through 2030 and to 2% thereafter.  From 2012 through 2021, 2% of allowances will be allocated for international adaptation and clean technology transfer.  The amount of allowances allocated for these purposes will increase to 4% from 2022 through 2026 and to 8% thereafter.  Half of these allowances will be used for adaptation and half for clean technology transfer. 

Worker Assistance and Job Training.  From 2012 through 2021, 0.5% of allowances will be allocated for worker assistance and job training.  This amount will increase to 1% thereafter.

Summary of Amendment printed in part A of the report of the Committee on Rules accompanying H.Res. 587, to be considered as adopted upon adoption of the rule:

  1. Waxman: The amendment would make changes to accommodate States that utilize a central purchasing model for its renewable electricity standard, and makes additional changes. It would provide FERC with siting authority for the construction of certain high-priority interstate transmission lines constructed in the Western Interconnection. It also would amend the National Interest Electric Transmission Corridors.

    It would require the Agriculture Secretary to establish a list of types of domestic agricultural and forestry practices that result in reductions or avoidance of greenhouse gas emissions. It exempts the agriculture and forestry sectors from the bill's emission caps. It redefines "biomass." It grandfathers existing biodiesel plants to exempt them from lifecycle analysis under the RFS. It would permit states to convey allowances in a SEED account directly to renewable energy generators. It would require the Agriculture Secretary to establish a carbon incentives program to achieve supplemental greenhouse gas emissions reductions on private agricultural and forestland.

    It would establish a Renewable Electricity Standard (RES) for Federal agencies. It also would provide Federal agencies with the authority to enter into renewable energy power purchase agreements for up to 20 years. It would make natural gas fueled vehicles eligible for clean vehicle incentives, the vehicle integration program, and the manufacturing incentives for alternatively fueled vehicles. It would limit the cost of a permit for a license for the construction of a solar energy system. It would provide that noncompliance with permit cost requirements disqualifies the entity from Community Development Block Grants.

    It would authorize a national education and awareness program for the purpose of informing building, facility, and industrial plant owners and managers and decisionmakers, government leaders, and industry leaders about the large energy-saving potential of greater use of mechanical insulation and other benefits. It would amend the definition of a "cluster," as it applies to Energy Innovation Hubs. It would ensure that virtual connections qualify when defining a cluster.

    It would amend the Retrofit for Energy and Environmental Performance (REEP) program to provide that funds provided to disaster victims through the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act may qualify as the building owners' contribution toward the matching requirements of the REEP program. Requires the Federal agencies administering assistance to disaster victims through the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act shall provide information to disaster victims on the REEP program. It would provide 10 percent of funding under the REEP program for retrofits of public and assisted housing.

    It would create a Community Building Code Administration Grant program, providing $100 million over five years in competitive, matching grants for local building code enforcement. It would limit the Building Energy Performance Labeling Program in sec. 204 of the bill to new construction only. It would provide incentives to lenders and financial institutions to provide lower interest loans and other benefits to consumers who build, buy, or remodel homes and businesses to improve their energy efficiency. It would direct HUD to issue rules to prohibit private covenants that restrict or prohibit the installation of solar energy systems.

    It would authorize the Energy Secretary to develop a research program to study the factors affecting whether consumers adopt energy conservation practices or make energy efficiency improvements. It would require the Energy Secretary to report to Congress on a study on the use of thorium-fueled nuclear reactors for national energy needs, including a response to the IAEA study entitled "Thorium fuel cycle - Potential benefits and challenges."

    It would establish a clean energy career training clearinghouse to aid institutions with Federal resources, expertise, information and points of contact in establishing and maintaining quality training programs. It would add provision seeking to ensure that minority-owned and women-owned businesses can benefit from grants aimed at stimulating business development. It would require the Labor Secretary to monitor the potential growth of impacted and displaced workers to ensure that the necessary funding continues to support the number of workers affected. It would express the senses of Congress that the United States should work with the International Civil Aviation Organization.

    2. Republican Substitute Amendment to H.R. 2454 - American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009

  2. Forbes (Republican Substitute): Would strike the entire bill and insert the text of H.R. 513, the "New Manhattan Project for Energy Independence." (30 minutes)

Members are urged to VOTE NO.

Summary of H.R. 2996 - Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010

KEY INVESTMENTS

Environmental Protection Agency: $10.46 billion, $23 million below the President's request and $2.83 billion above 2009, to protect our nation's air, clean its waters and restore its lands.

  • Clean Drinking Water & Wastewater: $3.9 billion to help over 1500 communities improve their drinking water and wastewater systems. This includes: $2.3 billion for the Clean Water State Revolving Fund to ensure our nation's waters meet the goals of the Clean Water Act; $1.4 billion for the Drinking Water State Revolving Fund to protect public health by improving drinking water systems; and $160 million for direct grants to communities for water infrastructure. A portion of the State Revolving Funds will be available as subsidized loans, and 20 percent of each State Revolving Fund will be available for green infrastructure, water or energy improvements, or other environmentally innovative projects. It is estimated that these funds will create as many as 40,000 new construction jobs.
  • Great Bodies of Water: $667 million, $89 million above the President's request and $507 million above 2009, to protect the nation's great water bodies including the Great Lakes, Puget Sound, and the Chesapeake Bay. Includes $475 million for the Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, which will involve the coordination and collaboration of 16 Federal agencies, the States of the Great Lakes Region, local government, and citizens groups in an effort to restore the source of 20 percent of the world's fresh surface water.
  • Cleaning Up Hazardous Waste and Toxic Sites: $1.5 billion, equal to the President's request and $3 million above 2009, to clean up dangerous toxic waste including $605 million for the Superfund to clean up hazardous substances at over 1,500 of the nation's worst toxic waste sites; $113 million to inspect and clean up underground toxic spills; and $100 million for evaluation and cleanup of Brownfield's former industrial and commercial sites to make problem properties ready for development and productive community use.
  • Enforcement: $601 million, equal to the President's request and $34 million above 2009, for effective criminal and civil enforcement, and to fund additional staff to allow EPA to meet its statutory requirement to have 200 criminal investigators.
  • Protecting our Children from Toxins in the Environment: $5 million to allow the EPA to fully fund four new centers of excellence to study the impact to children from toxins and chemicals in the environment and to expand EPA in-house research in this area. These funds are in addition to the request for $3.3 million to continue the Agency's initiative to monitor the air around schools.

Climate Change: $420 million, $24 million above the President's request and $189 million above 2009, for programs to address global climate change. This includes:

  • $28 million to implement the Energy Independence and Security Act, including $21 million to meet its requirement that the US produce 36 billion gallons of renewable fuels by 2022, and $7 million for carbon sequestration research (evaluating geological and biological potential and processes) at the US Geological Survey.
  • $50 million for EPA's Energy Star program which saves consumers $14 billion a year in energy costs by letting them know appliances' energy efficiency.
  • $10 million for new grants at EPA to encourage local communities to find ways to cut their greenhouse gas emissions.
  • $17 million to continue development of a Greenhouse Gas Registry, a first step in controlling greenhouse gasses.
  • $67 million for priority climate change research at the US Geological Survey, an increase of $22 million over 2009.
  • $32 million total for climate change research at the Forest Service, an increase of $5 million over 2009.
  • $15 million as requested for the National Global Warming and Wildlife Science Center at the US Geological Survey for wildlife adaptation to climate change.
  • $58 million to promote the development of renewable clean energy sources on Federal lands and waters.

Native Americans and Alaska Natives

Empower Native American communities: The Committee provides $6.8 billion, $654 million above the 2009 level and $39 million above the request, with an emphasis on improving health care, tribal law enforcement and education.  As in previous years, the Committee provides funding and direction on the specific issues of domestic violence and substance abuse in Indian country, which are at epidemic levels.  These joint BIA and IHS efforts, coordinated with funding and direction provided in the Commerce-Justice-Science appropriations bill, provide more Tribal law enforcement officers, new and upgraded detention centers, improved Tribal courts, and increased access to health programs in order to fight domestic violence and substance abuse.

Indian Health Service: $4.0 billion, $18 million above the President's request and $471 million above 2009, to support Tribal self-governance and improve the quality and availability of critical health care services for Native Americans. 

Bureau of Indian Affairs: $2.6 billion, $22 million above the President's request and $183 million above 2009, for law enforcement officers, teachers, and jobs programs that will strengthen Native communities. Indian education receives over $80 million in increases over the enacted level, of which $50 million is to forward fund Tribal colleges so they can better plan for the academic year. Another $33 million is invested in BIA law enforcement to strengthen police programs, detention center operations, and Tribal courts. 

Wildland Fire: $3.66 billion, $669 million above 2009 and $165 million above the President's request, for efforts to prevent and fight wildfires at the Forest Service and the Department of the Interior, including hazardous fuels reduction projects, State and volunteer fire assistance activities, and forest health projects.

  • Includes $357 million for the new wildfire suppression contingency reserve accounts, as requested;
  • Increases hazardous fuels projects by $91 million, or 17 percent over the request;
  • Increases overall wildfire suppression funding by $526 million, or 40 percent over 2009.

National Parks: $2.7 billion, $27 million above the President's request and $198 million above 2009, includes funds for the 10-year initiative to upgrade national parks before the 100th anniversary of the National Park Service in 2016, and $25 million for the new Park Partnership Project Grants Program.

National Wildlife Refuge System: $503 million, $20 million above the President's request and $40 million above 2009, to provide critically needed staff, implement climate change strategies, and improve conservation efforts.

US Forest Service (non-fire): $2.77 billion, $62 million above the President's request and $154 million above 2009, including $100 million for the Legacy Road and Trail Remediation program to protect streams and water systems from damaged forest roads.  Increases the Forest Legacy Land Conservation Program by $26.7 million above 2009, for a total of $76 million.

National Endowments for the Arts and Humanities: $340 million, $17 million above the President's request and $30 million above 2009; providing $170 million for the National Endowment for the Arts and $170 million for the National Endowment for the Humanities to preserve and encourage America's arts and cultural heritage.

Smithsonian: $774 million, $15 million above the President's request and $43 million above 2009, to support the world's largest museum complex; the increase above the request maintains level funding for efforts to reduce the backlog of deferred maintenance.  The Committee bill includes $20 million, as requested, for planning and design of the new National Museum of African American History and Culture to be built on the National Mall.

 

SIGNIFICANT CUTS

The bill contains over $320 million in program terminations, reductions and other savings from the fiscal year 2009 level and over $300 million from the budget request.  Included in this amount is a $142 million rescission from EPA prior-year STAG account funds, based on an Inspector General report of unliquidated obligations and $18 million in reductions from a number of requested increases for EPA administrative functions.  The bill terminates $28 million for a new initiative in Federal aid in wildlife restoration program due to concerns about implementation of the program.

 

OTHER IMPORTANT POLICY ITEMS

Coal leases on BLM land:  Language is included which disallows coal lease purchasers to pay bonus bids over 5 years.  This language requires coal purchasers to make bonus payments in the same manner as all Federal oil and natural gas purchasers.  This language provides a $207 million scoring credit because bonus payments will be made in one year rather than spread over five.  

MMS Ultra-Deepwater Research Fund deferral:  Language is included that defers $50 million in funding from oil and gas receipts that were a part of the 2005 Energy Policy Act of 2005.  The ultra deepwater fund provides $50 million annually for research for recovering oil and gas from ultra-deep waters in the Gulf of Mexico.  This funding directly benefits large oil companies. This language was not included in the request but was in the House-passed bill for FY 2008

MMS Outer Continental Shelf inspection fee:  Language is included, as requested, to implement a new fee for inspections of offshore oil and gas facilities.  This nominal fee ($2,000 to $6,000 per facility per year), will provide $10 million to partially offset the cost of the inspection program. 

MMS State Royalty Revenue Sharing:  Language is included, as in previous years that takes 2 percent of the Federal royalties from oil, gas, and mineral extraction ($49 million) and uses the scoring credit to partially offset the cost of administering the program.  This provision was not included in the request.

Office of Surface Mining, Emergency Remediation Grants:  The Committee agrees with the request to eliminate the emergency coal remediation grants ($12.8 million) for mine lands.  Under the Surface Mining Regulation and Control Act amendments of 2006, States received mandatory funding for these needs.  There are sufficient carryover balances for the States to transition their programs to the mandatory funding.

Wildfire suppression contingency accounts:  The bill includes $357 million in non-emergency contingency funding as requested.  The bill provides $526 million, or a 40 percent increase, for all wildfire suppression accounts. 

Davis-Bacon*:  The bill includes language that applies Davis-Bacon prevailing wage requirements to the Clean Water and Drinking Water State Revolving Funds.

Greenhouse Gas Registry*:  The bill includes language that prohibits EPA from including emissions from manure management systems in the mandatory reporting of greenhouse gas emissions.

Biological Sources of Greenhouse Gas Emissions*:  The bill includes language that prohibits EPA from promulgating a regulation to require Clean Air Act permits for emissions from biological processes associated with livestock production.

Guantanamo Detainees*:  No funds may be used to release detainees from Guantanamo Bay, Cuba to the Unites States territories of Guam, American Samoa, the United States Virgin Islands, the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico.  No funds may be used to transfer detainees to these territories until two months after the President submits a detailed plan regarding the proposed disposition of detainees.  Detainees from Guantanamo may not be transferred or released to the freely associated States, including the Federated States of Micronesia, the Republic of the Marshall Islands, and the Republic of Palau unless the President submits information about the transfers 30 days prior to such transfer.

*Adopted in Full Committee

Postponed Amendment Votes - H.R. 2996 - Department of the Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 2010

  1. Dicks (Manager's): This amendment would do three things: first, as requested by the Chairman of the authorizing committee, it allows States and citizen groups to use Federal funding to repair streams damaged by acid mine drainage from abandoned mines; second, it increases the National Park Service "Stateside" land acquisition program by $10 million, for a total of $40 million, to improve State and local recreational facilities and decreases the Department of the Interior working capital fund by $10 million; and third, increases Save America's Treasures (which funds the preservation of historic buildings) by $1 million, for a total of $31 million and decreases park service construction.
    Chairman Obey urges Members to VOTE YES.

  2. Heller: This amendment prevents any funds in this Act to be used to continue the construction of an interagency fire center on a specific 15 acre tract in Carson City, Nevada. The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) needs a center in this fire prone area and has already spent $2 million on design and planning. The BLM is currently taking comment on the proposal and the process should be allowed to proceed.
    Chairman Obey urges Members to VOTE NO.

  3. Jordan: This amendment reduces overall spending in the bill by $5.75 billion, or 17.8%. This would have major impacts on funding levels for environmental protection programs, health care and education of Native Americans, and management of our Federal lands. As many as 400 communities would go without assistance to repair and build drinking water and wastewater infrastructure. More than 2 million Native Americans would be denied inpatient and outpatient health care services and more than 40,000 cancer screenings would be eliminated.
    Chairman Obey urges Members to VOTE NO.

  4. Stearns: This amendment Reduces funding for the Environmental Protection Agency by 38%, or $3.97 billion. This amendment would have devastating impacts on programs that clean our air and water and remediate toxic waste sites. It would eliminate all funding for the Clean Water and Drinking Water State Revolving Funds and leave as many as 1,500 communities without assistance to repair aging wastewater and drinking water infrastructure. It would also eliminate initiatives in the bill to protect great water bodies like the Great Lakes, the Chesapeake Bay and 29 estuaries across this country. Final clean-up at as many as 30 superfund sites would be at risk.
    Chairman Obey urges Members to VOTE NO.

  5. Flake #1: This amendment eliminates $1 million in project funding for the Restore Good Fellow, Lodge, Indiana Dunes National Lakeshore. Rep. Visclosky requested this project.
    Chairman Obey urges Members to VOTE NO.

  6. Campbell #3: This amendment eliminates $150,000 in project funding for Traditional Arts in Upstate New York in Canton, NY. Rep. McHugh requested this project.
    Chairman Obey urges Members to VOTE NO.

  7. Flake #3: This amendment eliminates $150,000 in project funding for the Tarrytown Music Hall Restoration. Rep. Lowey requested this project.
    Chairman Obey urges Members to VOTE NO.

  8. Hensarling #1: This amendment eliminates $1 million in project funding for the Angel Island Immigration Station Foundation in San Francisco, CA. Reps. Pelosi and Woolsey requested this project.
    Chairman Obey urges Members to VOTE NO.

  9. Flake #4: This amendment Eliminates $150,000 in project funding for the Historic Fort Payne Coal and Iron Building Rehabilitation. Rep. Aderholt requested this project.
    Chairman Obey urges Members to VOTE NO.